Search Icon

Independent, Third-Party Support Definition (in 1,000 Words or Less)

Scott Hays
4 min read

Many organizations around the world are familiar with independent, third-party support. Many others are not. Still others have some preconceived notions about it that are perhaps a little askew.

Not to worry. This subject can be covered off in just a few paragraphs.

 

Third-party support definition, and what is a support service?

Third-party support is software support delivered by a provider other than the original vendor.

What is a support service? It’s any service from a third-party support provider or the vendor.

What services are covered? It depends. Third-party support services are often more comprehensive than vendor support services.

 

A (not-so) brief history

Third-party support for applications and databases from vendors such as Oracle and SAP has been a viable alternative to annual vendor maintenance and support contracts for many years. That market was disrupted in 2005 as new business models and third-party support providers got started.

Some organizations jumped at the chance to reduce annual support expense and get better, broader coverage. Those early adopters of third-party support paved the way for billions of dollars in total savings across thousands of organizations over the last 15 years.

A Gartner Research report states that “SPVM [Sourcing, Procurement and Vendor Management] leaders are now acknowledging third-party support as an established option.”1

Independent support services are going mainstream. Gartner’s report predicts that “The third-party software support market will grow from $351 million in 2019 to $1.05 billion by 2023 — a 200% increase.”1

There are many reasons for this acceleration of interest in third-party support — they all go back to the fundamental differences between vendor support and third-party support. More on those in a moment.

 

Common goals, different models

Starting off with something they have in common: Enterprise software support helps an organization minimize business disruption and maximize business value from the software applications it uses to run the business.

If those goals were always being achieved for all Oracle and SAP licensees, then there probably wouldn’t ever have been a need for third-party support. Ah, but that wasn’t the case. Many organizations were taking a long, hard look at the costs and benefits of staying on vendor maintenance contracts, and the costs outweighed the benefits. And that negative number was getting bigger over time. Licensees were getting less for more — never a good thing.

Where there’s an unmet business need, there’s an opening for a new solution or even a market disrupter. Enter third-party support.

An independent support services provider has a completely different business model than a software publisher. Oracle and SAP generally have large portions of their revenue derived from maintenance contracts and a disproportionately small amount of their expense going to support activities. The profit on support can reach above 90%,2 with a large portion of the money going to fund investments in new products and future releases.

By contrast, leading, third-party support providers derive a healthy yet reasonable gross margin on support revenue while investing in people and technology that produce a superior support experience.

And that can be done at 50% less annual cost to the clients.

Savings on annual fees and overall operational costs

From an organization’s perspective, cost is the most obvious difference between software vendor support and independent support services. Most organizations that switch to third-party support quickly save at least 50% on annual support fees. Additional costs can be reduced or avoided, yielding up to 75-90% in total savings. They include the costs of supporting customizations (the software vendors typically don’t cover that), the costs of self-support when the vendor’s support is not responsive or comprehensive enough, and the cost of forced upgrades or migrations mandated by the vendor to stay on a fully supported release.

To that last point, more than cost avoidance accrues from stepping off the vendor’s version escalator. There’s the real benefit of agility and freedom. When an organization is no longer locked into a vendor-dictated roadmap, it liberates funds and resources to pursue its own business priorities—its business-driven roadmap.

 

IT roadmaps: vendor-dictated or business-driven?

There was a time — perhaps a decade or two ago — when ERP applications from Oracle and SAP were gaining significant new functionality with every major release. The platforms were still growing into the full footprint of financials, operations, customer relationship management, supply chain management, and human capital management that they were intending to cover. Then they matured and gained stability while the functionality expansion slowed. These suites of applications are now working behind the scenes in organizations around the world and across most industries. They are the software workhorses of the modern business world.

So why does a client need to continue to spend the same (or increasing) amount of money for support every year than in the beginning when applications were new, less stable, and rapidly expanding? Because the vendors haven’t let licensees off the hook. They continue to charge more and more for support while requiring the licensees to stay on current releases with regular upgrades to stay fully supported. Licensees that have fallen behind have generally been relegated to reductions in support privileges (sometimes called “sustaining support”) or worse.

While it is true that staying on the vendor’s annual maintenance contract gives licensees the rights to future enhancements, what the software vendor decides to put into any particular release may or may not be important to them. That’s what is meant by a “vendor-dictated” roadmap. If you stay on maintenance, you can have the enhancements. But they too are like a box of chocolates — “you never know what you’re gonna get.”

To sum up the third-party support definition: Third-party support provides an enhanced support experience that can be more comprehensive than software vendor support. It costs less straight away, avoids related costs, and allows for more freedom in pursuing business innovation priorities.

There — just under 1,000 words. And speaking volumes.

 

1Gartner Research – Predicts 2020: Negotiate Software and Cloud Contracts to Manage Marketplace Growth and Reduce Legacy Costs, January 2020

2Brightworks Research & Analysis – How to Not Waste Money on Oracle and SAP Support, September 2018

 

This website has been built using modern web standards not fully supported by your browser. Please consider updating your browser.

Upgrade Today